comparison

You are browsing the search results for "comparison"

High Shipping Costs Top List of Reasons for Shopping Cart Abandonment

PayPal has released new survey data showing why online consumers leave their shopping carts behind. Survey participants were asked to tell which reasons were “very important” in abandoning their purchases.

High shipping charges: 46% Wanted to comparison shop: 37% Lack of money: 36 percent Wanted to look for a coupon: 27% Wanted to shop offline: 26% Couldn’t find preferred pay option: 24% Item was unavailable at checkout: 23% Couldn’t find customer support: 22% Concerned about security of credit card data: 21%

The price tag associated with the average abandoned shopping cart was $109. That’s a number merchants should be concerned about.

“Merchants who don’t welcome back abandoners with open arms are leaving hundreds of dollars per shopper on the table,” added Davis. “Merchants need to remember the items that customers abandon and make it easy for them to buy when they return. Sweetening the deal with free shipping, coupons and special discounts is also a great way to encourage online shoppers to complete their purchases.”

I can attest that exorbitant shipping costs. I was recently shopping online for a certain type of single cup coffee packs. While I found a great price, the shipping costs made the total cost higher than purchasing offline.

You have to make shopping online more appealing than offline if you want shoppers to complete the purchase process. Since shopping online requires people to wait for delivery, price is where you must be competitive.

[image] [image]

[image]

Facebook adding payment platform?

Chris Crum at WebProNews.com has pieced together some very interesting pieces of information regarding Facebook, a former Googler and a new payment system.

Facebook in May announced that it was testing a new payments system that would deal in real money, rather than virtual currencies that it had been using for any number of applications. This might work fine for Mafia Wars and other light games that Facebook has increasingly added, but if you were to want to move into, say, storefronts or product comparisons, you’d clearly want to be able to deal in real currency.

Enter announcement two: Facebook has hired an ex-Google Checkout director to develop these payment systems. Given Facebook’s immense and growing popularity, its standing as place for sharing opinions and favorites, its open platform and an army of marketers desperate to monetize work on Facebook, it could wind up being an absolute perfect storm.

Imagine classified ads or, bigger yet, entire storefronts integrated directly into a social networking site a la A Small World – except instead of a half million very exclusive members considering five and six-digit purchases in between their social networking activities, it’s 200 million+ people worldwide who could have their friends’ opinions of a product just a click away from being able to purchase it.

Chris has screenshots and more details – worth checking out.

What do you think? Would you purchase or shop on Facebook? Would your customers?

[image] [image]

[image]

152 Million U.S. Internet Users Watched 16.8 Billion Online Videos in April

comScore has just released April 2009 data from the comScore Video Metrix service, which shows that nearly 152 million U.S. Internet users watched 16.8 billion online videos during the month, representing an increase of 16 percent over March. This means 78.6 percent of the total U.S. Internet audience viewed online video in April, and the average online video viewer watched 385 minutes of video, or 6.4 hours.

YouTube at SES London 2008.jpg According to a press release, “A significant increase in video viewing at YouTube during April contributed to the month’s sizeable gains.”

107.1 million viewers watched 6.8 billion videos on YouTube.com — which is 63.5 videos per viewer. By comparison, 49 million viewers watched 387 million videos on MySpace.com — which is 7.9 videos per viewer. About 45.4 million viewers watched 355.2 million videos on Yahoo! Sites — which is 7.8 videos per viewer. And 40.1 million viewers watched almost 397 million videos on Hulu — which is an average of 9.9 videos per viewer.

In other words, YouTube not only has an audience that is more than twice as large, this audience also watches six to eight times more videos per month.

At SES London 2009, I interviewed Li Evans about online video. She was with KeyRelevance back then, but is now the Director of Social Media at Serengeti Communications. Li talked about how putting your brand out via YouTube is becoming a new marketing channel for companies.

Li will also be one of the panelists at SES Toronto next week in the session “Optimizing for Video Search: Virgin Territory?” The other panelists will be Gregory Markel, Founder/President, Infuse Creative, LLC, and Amanda Watlington, Owner, Searching for Profit.

This page contained an embedded video. Click here to view it.

Liana Evans, KeyRelevance, on video branding strategy at SES London

The moderator of the “Optimizing for Video Search: Virgin Territory?” session will be Mona Elesseily, Director of Marketing Strategy, Page Zero Media. If you go to SES Toronto, remember to compliment Mona for having, “Nice shoes.” I forgot at one conference and paid dearly for my oversight.

Mona Elesseily.jpg
Mona Elesseily of Page Zero Media and Greg Jarboe of SEO-PR compare their “nice shoes” at SES New York.

[image] [image]

[image]

Google Trends Releases Embeddable Widget

Google Trends has released an embeddable widget that you can place on your website. The annoying thing is that you can’t set what terms you want to appear on the widget. So, I’m stuck copying and pasting code featuring the default terms, which today are the top four contestants on American Idol (which was reduced to three last night), when I’d rather compare teams who made the playoffs in the NHL!

Still, users, if they know what the heck they’re doing, can click the “edit” button next to the terms and enter their own terms to compare. Try it for yourself below:

[ http://www.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=http://www.google.com/ig/modules/trends_gadget.xml

Related Reading:
Does Google Analytics Share Data with Google Trends and Ad Planner?
Google Trends for Websites Adds to Comparison Sites Confusion
New Version of Google Trends Released

[image] [image]

[image]

NADAguides.com Offers Comprehensive Car Search Tools

NADAguides.com has completed the development of its comprehensive car buying tools. The tools are designed to be intuitive to the research, decision-making and buying process. Here’s what to expect:

Vehicle Search - This is a good place to start if you don’t already know what type of vehicle you wish to buy. Search by custom criteria including price, body style, manufacturer, MPG and more. The results, of course, will return back vehicles matching those specifications. Vehicle Comparison – When you know a few models you’re interested in, you can compare up to four at a time with this handy tool. Compare makes, models, trim levels, or years. Total Cost of Ownership – This is a useful tool because it includes things that are often forgotten during the car buying process. The tool calculates the cost of owning a given vehicle over a 5 year period including depreciation, financing, insurance, maintenance and opportunity costs.

This type of search emphasizes the idea that marketing begins with the product. Vehicles that do well in NADAguides.com search tools will be the ones meeting customers desires and needs.

Related Reading:
AutoTrader.com Sees Record Traffic in March 2009
Cars.com Adds DealerChat to Online Advertising Packages

[image] [image]

[image]

February 2009 Sees Increase in Search Queries

comScore has released search rankings for February 2009. When they release rankings, they compare them to the month before. Of course, that’s a bit of funky methodology since the two months will inevitably have a different amount of days (with the exception of a July/August comparison).

In this case, February needs even more careful inspection. Yours truly has taken a look at the numbers from last February, a leap year, and compared them to this February.

The following numbers are by the million. For example, the total number of searches for February 2009 was 13.1 billion, but below, it’s represented as 13,104:

(Click on the image to view larger graphic)

comscorefeb2009v2008_0309.jpg

Here’s the data comparing to January 2009:

comscorefeb2009vjan2009_0309.jpg

Here’s a comparison of the search market share. As you can see, Google continues its dominance:

comscoresearchsharefeb2009_0309.jpg

Related Reading:
U.S. Online Search Behavior Mimicks Economy
Yahoo! Steals Search Share from Google in January 2009

[image] [image]

[image]


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser
Mobilytics