Engaging the culture by challenging the status quo

The Conservative Brotherhood (a blogger association that I am a part of) has decided to try to pick a subject for the week in which we will contribute our “two cents”. For this week the subject is reparations. Below, I have provided a list of opinions already provided by the group:
For the longest time, I have been listening to all sides of the reparations debate and I have found valid points on all sides. Because I hate re-hashing certain issues (like this one) that have been debated for years, my hope is to make this piece as short as possible and to the point. Hopefully I can offer a somewhat unique perspective on this very important issue.
For starters, I must say that I totally agree with one of our sister sites, Booker Rising. This is what the moderator of that site had to say regarding a recent USA Today article dealing with how reparations activists are encouraged by recent acknowledgment of slave trade beneficiaries:
“So there is a black consensus on an apology (which Booker Rising supports), but not for reparations (which Booker Rising believes have already been paid: the billions in affirmative action, Great Society, War On Poverty, etc. Most black folks are now middle-class, so individual challenges now primarily obstruct folks, not racism).”
I know it may seem that I cheating here by using “outside” opinions on this matter, but I just do not feel like it is necessary to keep re-inventing the wheel on this issue. Here is an article that I found on a free essays website. It doesn’t give the author, so I will just provide you with the link. Since it is free, I will provide you with the whole article. I will add my thoughts at the end of all of this.
==========
REPARATIONS COMPARISON Ever since the beginning of time groups of people have been used or persecuted by other groups who believed to be superior. The three groups being discussed in this paper are the Japanese-Americans, who were sent to internment camps during World War II, the European Jews, who were victims of acts of genocide at the hands of the Nazi government in Germany, and the Africans, now African-Americans, who were forced to board ships to America for the purpose of slavery. The Japanese-Americans, during WW II, were taken from their homes and forced to give up any job or business they maintained. This was supposedly a deterrent against the Japanese-Americans being potential security threats during the war. After WW II they were given $25 and a train ticket to wherever their home was before they were relocated. Most of them went back to find that their job was no longer open. They were forced to live a life of poverty. In 1988, an act was passed which granted Japanese-Americans who had been directly affected by this act $20,000 a piece. The Jews in Germany were treated in worse manner than the aforementioned group. Even though death did occur at the internment camps in The United States, it was mostly due to unsanitary conditions. In Germany the government was purposely killing the Jewish people with various tactics such as gas chambers and firing squads. Some Jews were able to leave the country before the brunt of the violence against them started. Though lucky enough to leave with their lives, they were not so fortunate when it came to their personal belongings, including money. The German government, after the Nazi regime, felt obliged to pay those people who were affected for lost property and wages as reparations. Starting in the 1600’s, Europeans began capturing Africans to bring them over to the United States to work the fields in the southern states. These men, women, and children were taken from their native environments, in which they may have held positions of authority, and made the property of other people whose only differences were skin color and culture. Even worst was the fact that some tribal leaders were selling their own members to the Europeans. African-Americans, though legal slavery has been abolished for over 100 years, still have not completely achieved the respect and status of the dominant group in the United States. Unlike the two previous groups discussed, the Jews and the Japanese-Americans, supposed plans of reparations like the Homestead and Land Grant Acts failed because of a lack of concern by the government combined with a lack of resistance by the Black community. I agree that all of these occurrences are definite atrocities. The difference, I see between the first two and the last group is that these were orders given by the government in power rather than “free enterprise†by certain individuals. It is terrible that African-Americans had to endure such harsh treatment, but how can any criteria be established by which to grant reparations. Had the government made it a rule that all Black people were to be enslaved rather than simply allowing it, the situation would be somewhat different. I say somewhat because I have not yet heard anyone distinctly give a way that slavery has affected them financially. Plus, how do the people whose ancestors did not come to this country until after slavery get taken out of the equation? I guess I have always taken the stance that, though Black Americans have not completely achieved equality, there are far too many opportunities available for people to be complaining about what opportunities they don’t have. Though it’s sad, it’s true because I have family members and associates that do it. I personally have never been to Africa, but I guess because of my comfort in the environment I was raised in, I’d rather be right here in America. But one last point I’d like to make is that those Black people who have been able to achieve certain successes need to help those people who haven’t so that we can better compete with the majority in this country someday.
emphasis are mine
=========
From what I gather from the pro-reparations group, the money that they seek will be used to economically even the playing field for black Americans. As the Booker Rising website suggests, the challenges that many black Americans face today have much to do with the individual rather than systematic racism.
I personally agree with some critics of the reparations movement that this movement has the tendency to be somewhat racist in nature. Here’s why:
1- There is a general assumption being made that all whites have somehow benefited from slavery.
As one writer puts it, there was only a small number of whites in this country who were actually directly involved in the slave trade. It is very true that few whites actually spoke out against these crimes; however, I think it is a far stretch to indite every white person that was around during those days and their descendants for not speaking out against slavery.
Another point to consider, for the whites who did fight against slavery and in some instances lost their lives as a result, are their descendants still responsible for paying reparations to a people they tried to help?
2- The reparations movement does not include a plan to seek repayment from African tribes that sold their fellow brothers into slavery. The only target is whites and white-owned corporations.
Another fact to consider in this biased search for justice is that there was a significant number of blacks in this country who also benefited from the slave trade. The following is an excerpt from the website Issues & Views:
Even though [black] slaveowners usually demonstrated benevolent behavior towards their slave relations and friends, a commercial or materialistic exchange existed between them and their slaves purchased as investments. In fact, the free blacks who maintained a dual relationship with their slaves had no universal commitment against slavery. To them, slavery was an oppressive institution when it affected a beloved relative or a trusted friend, but beyond that realm, slavery was viewed as a profit-making institution to be exploited (more…)
Here are some other links that discuss this “buried” historical fact:
Dixie’s Censored Subject: Black Slaveowners
Free Black Slaveowners in South Carolina
Black Slaveowners: Free Black Slave Masters in South Carolina, 1790-1860 (book)
If the reparations movement is serious about seeking full repayment for slavery, then according to this historical fact, we owe ourselves. Again, an important issue that is not mentioned in this argument. Instead, we choose to give ourselves a pass while keeping “whitey” on the hook.
If reparations is about seeking economic power, then how are we to interpret the amount of black mayors that have been elected in major cities across the US? Yes, it is true that a mayor is not a source of finances, but this position does have major input into how funds are spent in his/her jurisdiction. According to the website for the National Conference of Black Mayors, there are roughly 42 black mayors throughout this country of jurisdictions of 50,000 people or more. Yet if you look at many of these cities with black leadership, you will find things like crime, homicide, drug usage, poverty, declining school systems higher than any most areas throughout the US. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BLACK INCOMPETENCE!!! I have to put that in caps so that some of my readers will understand that I am not solely blaming black leadership for these problems. Instead, I am simply pointing out the fact that having authority over large budgets does not guarantee economic empowerment.
Cities like Philadelphia are still learning this lesson. The African-American Chamber of Commerce recently complained that the city of Philadelphia has been keeping them away from economic opportunities. Here is how they described the situation:
“A coalition of predominantly African-American business, civic and community leaders, working with Philadelphia’s African-American Chamber of Commerce (AACC), today likened the economic exclusion of blacks in the City of Brotherly Love to the economic hardship suffered by sub-Saharan African nations…(more)
Mind you, this is a city with a black mayor (John Street). Here is a case where a black individual has significant power over both the black tax dollar, white tax dollar, etc. yet blacks are still not seeing the benefit of his “empowerment”. So once again, money by itself cannot reverse the problems that ail black America. The problem goes a lot deeper than access to financial resources.
Each year scholarships for black Americans are being added to an already growing list that has been growing for years. And each year, millions of dollars of this scholarship money goes unclaimed by black American students. The same goes for money slated for minority economic empowerment. Once again, the access to the funds are there, but for whatever reason much of it just sits. Yet despite this fact, the pro-reparations crowd is still asking for more.
The last point I want to mention on this subject is the whole issue on how to “properly” distribute these funds is there were to be any kind of reparations payment. Most black Americans today are not full-blooded descendants of African slaves. How would one determine how much money a black person is to receive if they are only a percentage of their African descendants?
As you can see, there are many unanswered questions and intentional oversights that places the case for reparations on shaky ground. Referring back to the quote from the Booker Rising website, “reparations” have already been paid to black Americans in the form of the many array of government programs offered exclusively to us. Now we must learn how to effectively utilize the resources we have both acquired and gained access to thanks to the sacrifices of those that have gone before us.
Sphere: Related Content
You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here
No Responses to A few thoughts on reparations
sean mccray
June 25th, 2005 at 10:51 am
another difference between the germns/japanese and African Americans, is the first two have clear victims that can be identified, and the victimizer is clear. There is no possibilty of reimbursing someone who did not directly suffer.
My biggest problem is the inability to implement it with fairness and in a just manner. You cannot correct an injustice with another injustice. I also think the reparations movement ignores the other groups who have suffered. This takes away the credibility.
Sanna Hassan
June 25th, 2005 at 2:58 pm
There is another way of looking at reparations. Instead of all having the same starting point, e.g. school at age 5 ending at final exams at 18, with your education (generalising) dependent on the facilities around you both in your home and school environment, that there should be an aim to get to the same finishing point.
Many factors at age 5 could be assessed as to what would produce a uniformly educted generation of teenagers 13 or so years later. Since it is unlikely that the wealthy with their access to private education would give that privilege up, the bar must be at that level. Every effort must be to improve urban, home and educational facilities so that at 18, all may stand together, no one disadvantaged (by anything other than their own personality!)
Keith
June 25th, 2005 at 8:25 pm
“Since it is unlikely that the wealthy with their access to private education would give that privilege up, the bar must be at that level.”
It’s not the fault of the wealthy in my view.
The government has created an education system that is seriously flawed, vouchers would be a very good start to a more level playing field.
mechi
January 26th, 2006 at 9:58 pm
reparation : means repayment for the work done…… the work was done where is the pay
solacio
April 1st, 2007 at 2:02 pm
There is no need to “indite” personally each White individual, but there is a need for an acceptance of the fact that a nation committed a grievious wrong.
One very important thing to remember is that, individuals didn’t go above or under the law in creating a society of slavery, but individuals lived within the laws of that time that ordained slavery to be legal and actually had laws concerning the handling, selling, breeding and housing of slaves.
“There is a general assumption being made that all whites have somehow benefited from slavery.”
I do not believe that all whites benefited from slavery, but they did and continue to benefit from the law that deemed them regardless of financial worth, to be equally human, whereas, those of African descent were legally deemed less than equal to White men.
“2- The reparations movement does not include a plan to seek repayment from African tribes that sold their fellow brothers into slavery. The only target is whites and white-owned corporations. ”
Currently, there are thousands of older Jewish people that receive welfare and housing assistance from our government because they were victims of Hitler’s war on them or they are the descendants of such victims. Did our government receive this money paid to the Jewish victims from Germany or is it paid by my taxes?!?
-Not to mention the fact that I feel the part of the continent of Africa that greatly involved itself in the slave trade is currently being pounded by other natural and unnatural disasters. Some of them initiated and funded by our wonderful government.
“If reparations is about seeking economic power, then how are we to interpret the amount of black mayors that have been elected in major cities across the US?”
I feel that this writer is confusing the present day’s hard work and effort of politicians and their constituents with the responsibility of a nation to right a grievious wrong. The fact that Blacks are “allowed” to be mayors and make a lot of money is only in response to the reversal of Jim Crow laws that were set in place AFTER slavery’s end to keep Blacks from achieving what is the rights of all humans. And for those that did receive land and a mule at the end of slavery along with their freedom. Where did that land and mule go? It eventually turned into payments for taxes and goods at exorbitant prices. Which caused for many Blacks to return to their lives of legalized slavery. Only now they were fully equal to be abused by larger families and previous owners, the founders of many of our large corporate conglomerates. Who may I mention have no problem donating to poor countries around the world, but shun away from admitting their own involvement and profit from the very thing they say they are against today.
“Most black Americans today are not full-blooded descendants of African slaves.”
Most slaves during slavery were not full-blooded descendants of African slaves. My family’s light skin attests to that, yet, my family has no 17th-18th century history of intermarrying with Whites. Hmmm? Wonder why? Yet another catastrophe created by the enslavement of nations.
““reparations†have already been paid to black Americans in the form of the many array of government programs offered exclusively to us. ”
I believe that what you call “reparations” is only th US continuing to be Big Brother to the world. Mexicans receive government assistance on a daily basis, though they AREN’T EVEN CITIZENS. What war were they in? What centuries of American enslavement did they endure? This is not reparations. This is the New Deal, issued to all. Latin Americans also receive assistance because they are Latin Americans and there are many Americans whose last names are “latin” and receive assistance based only on that merit. So the fact that there are government programs offered exclusively to us means nothing. Nowadays if I have a yellow dog and a green cat, I’d qualify for a government program.
The problem is that slavery didn’t just create economic hardships for current Blacks. But it erased cultures that we now search for and are ever re-creating, sometimes to the dismay of public figures like Bill Cosby and even myself. Slavery and its offspring has created a world society that still views Blacks as the “Black Sheep” of the USA. Where even foreigners who come here for the first time view us as disdainful. My question is, what do we do about that? How does America fix that?
Duane
April 1st, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Since you have gone through all of this trouble to link today’s whites with slavery. Please answer me the following:
1 – What is stopping you today on getting a well-paying job?
2 – What is stopping you from creating your own business?
3 – What is stopping you from taking time out of your schedule in order to spend time black kids that do not have a dad at home?
4 – What is stopping you from getting an education?
5 – What is stopping you from learning how to not only invest your money, but to train other Black folks so that they do not have to repeat the circle of poverty?
6 – What is stopping you from helping our men who are in prison to find employment once they get out?
7 – What is stopping you from traveling “to” and “from” anywhere in the world you wish to go?
8 – What is stopping you from getting some folks together to support struggling Black businesses?
9 – What is stopping you from pointing to places where kids who are struggling in school with certain subjects can get the help that they need?
I could add plenty more, but why bother.
To be honest with you, I would prefer that you did not answer these questions because it still would not do a freakin’ thing about these actual issues. My hope is that before you continue to bang your beggars’ cup to White America, take some stock in the untapped strength of your own people. There are plenty of us out here that are doing just fine without White America’s charity. Stop philosophizing about crumbs from the White man’s table and build something!