If you’re new here, you may want to subÂscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Yesterday’s artiÂcle has genÂerÂated a couÂple of quesÂtions that I really like, and to which I responded. Now I want to get peoÂple to ask quesÂtions here on the Blog!
AnyÂway here’s the two quesÂtions, and my response.
Hi Wayne, You wrote:
~~~~~Clients come to learn comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion. They learn how, and refuse to actuÂally do it with their partÂner. I ask why. “She’s not coopÂerÂatÂing.†“I know he’ll do it for a month, and then stop.†The resisÂtance to doing is two-fold.
First, it is about the fear of tryÂing the new thing. SecÂond, it is the fear of failing.~~~~~
I am inclined to feel there is a more imporÂtant reaÂson for resisÂtance: if I start comÂmuÂniÂcatÂing honÂestly I will be forced to conÂfront many of the milÂlions of comÂpulÂsive beliefs which I use to simÂplify my thinkÂing. ConÂfronting these will demand sigÂnifÂiÂcant change in much of my funÂdaÂmenÂtal beliefs. That is really **HARD WORK** and nobody is eager to embark on that.
It is *very* much easÂier to cling to my existÂing prejÂuÂdices and beliefs (most of which I learned as a two-year-old in preÂcisely the way you illusÂtrated). They have served me poorly for the last 40 (or whatÂever) years and the devil you know is always to be preferred.
This is a sound ecoÂnomic judgeÂment. It is not misÂtaken. Because the stick-in-the-mud does not know how much it is costÂing him he canÂnot take the cost of his fear of change into account. He can see only the very real cost of change and fails to value the benÂeÂfits because he does not recogÂnise them. RegretÂtably, that is a ratioÂnal response.
The probÂlem is the same as that you illusÂtrated for the infant. We canÂnot underÂstand or value what we do not perceive.
This is a chicken-and-egg conunÂdrum to which I see no simÂple solution.
My reply:
Ben & Jock think (and I agree) that someÂwhere around 5% of the popÂuÂlaÂtion chooses to examÂine their beliefs, and let go of what does not work, adoptÂing more eleÂgant behavÂiours, etc.
I think your analyÂsis is spot on. And yet, over the years, what I have seen are clients who decide that the way they are doing life is not worth doing any more, and so they adopt new methÂods. And I agree this is defÂiÂnitely not easy, nor for the faint of heart.
I susÂpect that everyÂone feels a sense of “someÂthing is wrong,†and what is wrong tends to be an irraÂtional fear one represses. DependÂing on your ’stripe’ you might see it as Freud did: sexÂual represÂsion, or as exisÂtenÂtialÂists do: fear of death, or as BudÂdhists do: (my present favourite) as an essenÂtial knowÂing that I have no “Self†— that there’s just a void “in there.â€
Most simÂply feel greater or lesser amounts of Thoreau’s “quiet desÂperÂaÂtion.†This, it seems to me is what motiÂvates the 5% or so to creÂate another path for themÂselves. This requires the assisÂtance of someÂone who is also on a path of self-exploration and change.
Or so I keep sugÂgestÂing… and so it seems to me.
2) Are expeÂriÂences truly dupliÂcated? Is it posÂsiÂble to step into the same stream twice or do we conÂstruct the event as if it really is hapÂpenÂing rather than purÂsuÂing it with curiosity?
My Reply:
As to events, well, your comÂment is sort of the point. Each sitÂuÂaÂtion is entirely unique (and meanÂingÂless) — and the ’flaw’ such as it is, is to attempt to fit the unique expeÂriÂence into a patÂtern. Now, in a sense, this makes sense
as I don’t want to relearn to chew my food. As i relate to inter and intra perÂsonal sitÂuÂaÂtions, howÂever, I want to allow for myself the posÂsiÂbilÂity to respond, rather than to react. EspeÂcially if the way I typÂiÂcally ’react’ is getÂting me results I do not want.
In other words, ‘It is too difÂfiÂcult until it is not.’
I susÂpect the key to all of this is the willÂingÂness to conÂsult my goal for the interÂchange. If it is to deepen relaÂtionÂship, then my ego need drops away. Which also makes sense, as ’self’ is an erroÂneous conÂcept anyÂway! To paraÂphrase the BudÂdha, “SELF (as opposed to ’life’) is dukka (unsatisfactoriness.)â€
Related posts:


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.zemanta.com%2Freblog_e.png%3Fx-id%3Da9c2bc7b-8a4f-4093-95ad-6ffb2f0b3121)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.evernote.com%2Farticle-clipper.png)






![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.phoenixcentre.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fcleeng%2Fimg%2Flock2.png)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.phoenixcentre.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fcleeng%2Fimg%2Fpayment-methods-small.png)
It‘s quite in here! Why not leave a response?