If you’re new here, you may want to subÂscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
A few years ago, as some of you know, I pubÂlished my third book, This EndÂless Moment. I wanted to capÂture therein the essence of what I see as a self-responsible way of being.
One book has a way of leadÂing to another. I quickly realÂized that the idea of theÂoÂretÂiÂcal self-responsibility was popÂuÂlar, but as soon as I pressed the perÂson to be self-responsible, out popped the excuses.
I notice, in my own life, that when I am havÂing a misÂerÂable moment, I am creÂatÂing it through how I am definÂing myself. This ‘misery-making’ process is a dance between jusÂtiÂfiÂcaÂtion and story inventÂing. In order to escape into self-responsibility, I must take action. The drama stops as soon as I stop thinkÂing that the story I tell myself is ‘real.’
<>Out of this realÂizaÂtion is emergÂing another book, this a colÂlecÂtion of old and new Zen stoÂries, designed to be heard and inteÂgrated by westÂern ears. FolÂlowÂing is a chapÂter called, ‘The Myth of a Self.’ This artiÂcle may also be included in the next Shen, The Haven’s paper newsletter.
Well, we might as well start with the hard stuff. You do not exist anyÂwhere but here and now. Never did, never will. Amen.
Here is a Zen joke.
I told it last night and DarÂbella said,
“Am I supÂposed to get that?â€
I answered, “Nope.â€
How many Zen MasÂters does it take to change a light bulb?
Answer: The rose bush in the garden.
Get it?
ProbÂaÂbly not.
I am not going to explain it to you, or not really. It is worth ponÂderÂing a bit, though. Here is a hint: WakÂing up requires the dropÂping of pat, simÂplisÂtic, and obviÂous answers.
ConÂsider: How often do you find yourÂself misÂerÂable, judgÂing your life to be awful or meanÂingÂless, and what hapÂpens then? Do you not find yourÂself askÂing some form of this quesÂtion: “Why is this hapÂpenÂing to me? Why is my life like this?†Is it posÂsiÂble for you to explore the posÂsiÂbilÂity that this is the wrong quesÂtion? It is the wrong quesÂtion because there is no “you†that has a life.
Think about how you define yourÂself. Your parÂents, tribes, and comÂmuÂnity, by the way, taught this definÂing process to you. I wrote about this in This EndÂless Moment, in the DeconÂstrucÂtion secÂtion. (Wayne C. Allen, 17f.) The process of definÂing yourÂself is always (and only) comparative.
If you conÂsider the physÂiÂcal world, you will realÂize that we know, say, light because there is its oppoÂsite, darkÂness. This is the meanÂing of the yin/yang symbol—black conÂtains white, and both are interÂreÂlated and required in order to ‘locate’ the other.
We estabÂlish our sense of self in the same way. Each thing we think we know about our self is based upon the couÂplet ‘me/not me.’ I am a male and am not a female. I have blue eyes and not brown eyes. I am human, and not a bufÂfalo, although I was born there. Our ego, then, is really nothÂing more than an accuÂmuÂlaÂtion of idenÂtiÂties, or ‘hats’ that we drag out, so as to have someÂthing to say about ourselves.
We can add to that the idea of culÂtural norms, which are nothÂing more than agreed-upon lists of ‘good/bad.’ As we note by lookÂing around us and around the world, the jury is out on the conÂtents of said lists—of the rightÂness or wrongÂness of pretty much everything.
It gets even more interÂestÂing when we move to ‘interÂnal states.’ InterÂnal states are nothÂing more than how I am shufÂfling my stoÂries to ‘prove’ what I have preÂdeÂterÂmined is the cause of my present sitÂuÂaÂtion or self-definition.
RememÂberÂing our couÂplet rule, conÂsider the stateÂment, “My parÂents didn’t bring me up right.†For me, such stateÂments raise the quesÂtion, “ComÂpared to what?†To someÂone bought up ‘right,’ I guess. There is, howÂever, a probÂlem here. The perÂson makÂing this stateÂment is comÂparÂing herÂself to a perÂson she imagÂines to have been brought up ‘right,’ or to what she read in a book, or learned in a class. In other words, she is comÂparÂing herÂself to ‘non-reality,’ and findÂing herÂself lacking.
Let us supÂpose you talk to your best friend, whom you judge to be the ‘brought up right’ examÂple to your ‘not.’ Your friend says, “But, I had a misÂerÂable childÂhood, I was deprived, even worse than you were!†Now what can one do? Have a vicÂtim conÂtest? Go to the crappy parÂentÂing triÂbunal, to get a “Who was raised worse†deciÂsion? (ActuÂally, many peoÂple go to therÂaÂpists for exactly this reason—to have an expert conÂfirm their belief in their own victimhood.)
Then, the judgeÂment starts. “I should not have been treated like that!â€
This is simÂply and plainly silly. “It’s not fair†changes nothÂing about who and where you are right now. Here is the bare truth of life (feel free to take notes…)—your life is as it is, and hapÂpened as it hapÂpened. It is a meanÂingÂless waste of time to sugÂgest, “It should have been difÂferÂent,†because there is no difÂferÂent, and there is no should. Your life is (always and only) what hapÂpens, how you process it, and what you do with it.
While this may seem cold and calÂcuÂlatÂing, definÂing yourÂself as a vicÂtim of your past changes nothÂing in the here and now. EndÂlessly telling all and sundry of your sad and sorry life changes preÂcisely nothÂing in the here and now. To repeat, “Why did this hapÂpen?†is a meanÂingÂless quesÂtion. “What do I choose to do now?†on the other hand, has some potential.
A client once told me a story of her self-described ‘stuÂpidÂity and inepÂtiÂtude.’ She had dropped out of High School, had sevÂeral failed relaÂtionÂships, got pregÂnant, got marÂried, got pregÂnant, got sepÂaÂrated, and showed up on my doorstep, 3 year old in one hand and a one year old in the other. Woe, oh woe, was she.
Her story was a well-practiced, interÂnal comÂparÂiÂson with what her ego told her she “should have been.†She berated herÂself endÂlessly that, at 23, her life was, and would always be, a failure.
I said, “Have a breath, and then tell me what you might choose to do difÂferÂently with your life.†For some bizarre reaÂson, she looked at me, smiled, and said, “I want to be a nurse.†I said, “Walk down to the High School, enroll, get some child care, go to ColÂlege, become a nurse.â€
Rather than argue with me about the imposÂsiÂbilÂity of such a thing, she looked at me with great curiosÂity, said, “Hmm. OK,†and went and did exactly that. Four years later, DarÂbella and I attended her gradÂuÂaÂtion as an R.N.
All I can say is that she stopped idenÂtiÂfyÂing herÂself using her interÂnal story of how hard done by she was, stayed present, and started doing things difÂferÂently. None of this was easy, but she did it.
So, who was she? Was she the dud, the failÂure, the poor abused vicÂtim? Was she the sinÂgle mom with no hope? Was she the sucÂcessÂful stuÂdent, the nurse? Of course not. Those are just stoÂries, and not very helpÂful ones.
As she dropped the stoÂries, she disÂcovÂered that her life was a flow of present moments. She was who she was, each moment of the walk, and nothÂing more (or less) than this. She heard me askÂing another quesÂtion, findÂing another way of lookÂing at things, (the rose bush in the garÂden) and this broke her cycle of seeÂing things only one way. She had a breakÂthrough and that breakÂthrough was all about letÂting go of pre-defining her future based upon her stoÂries of her past.
The Zen-ish idea of “no self†is how life is. I canÂnot show you any more of myself than who I am right now. Even as I tell you stoÂries, all you see is me, right now, telling stoÂries. You do not see the ‘realÂity’ of the story—even if you were there, watchÂing it unfold with me, you would still see it difÂferÂently than I did. That is why we call them stoÂries. My story, my sense of my self, is not ‘true.’ I am only who I am right now. In this way, a sense of a fixed self is simÂply a convenience.
It is a useÂful tool to define myself as “Wayne.†HavÂing this idenÂtity makes it posÂsiÂble for you to write me cheque, allows the govÂernÂment to know what to put on my passÂport, and I can easÂily rememÂber I wear a shirt with a 15-inch colÂlar. My mother menÂtioned that they were going to call me DarÂryl, and I am no more DarÂryl than Wayne. I may be male, but this label is only useÂful for enterÂing the right washÂroom. I actuÂally think that uniÂsex “Ally McBeal†washÂrooms make more sense anyway.
I grew up more privÂiÂleged than some and less privÂiÂleged than othÂers, sucked at relaÂtionÂships until I didn’t, and to this day catch myself judgÂing that I am unloved, or not loved enough, judgÂing that I am excelÂlent, or midÂdling, or a failÂure at someÂthing. I find myself imagÂinÂing all kinds of dire outÂcomes for my life, and then I rememÂber I do not have a life. I have this moment, and this moment is pretty damn alright.
My story of my past is fluid and flexÂiÂble, and I dredge up examÂples (or invent them…) that prove whatÂever point I am tryÂing to make. I am thus ‘more’ someÂthing and ‘less’ another because of the stoÂries I select. PerÂversely, if I am desÂperÂate to prove some story regardÂing my imagÂiÂnary life or self, I just twist the story in my head to make it fit. That will be the moment that Dar turns to me and says, “You might want to get over yourÂself.†I give my head a shake and feel the heat of embarrassment.
The approach I take is to poke holes in the stoÂries you tell yourÂself. I want you to join me and give your head a shake, and to wonÂder over the foolÂishÂness that goes on between your ears. This foolÂishÂness, by the way, will go on until you die. All we can hope for is an acute awareÂness that it is hapÂpenÂing, and then a sense of humour. From this place, we can be like my client. She did not deny her past (hard to do, conÂsidÂerÂing the two kids she carÂried with her,) nor did she declare her life to be a closed book. She looked at her choices, noticed her judgeÂments, and decided to do someÂthing difÂferÂent anyway.
I know that it is a stretch to underÂstand that you have no past, no hisÂtory, and no self. All you are right now is whatÂever you believe that you are. Your subÂconÂscious mind is expert and creÂatÂing drama and ‘eviÂdence’ for whatÂever you are shovelling.
If you will conÂsider the posÂsiÂbilÂity that this is so, you can begin to act in this moment, not out of habit but out of choiceÂful focus. You can do what needs doing, in this moment, withÂout all of the “But I…I… can’t! (Sob, snifÂfle.)†nonÂsense. The essence of being is to recÂogÂnize our non-being—our non-self-ing. In this space, I, and you, and the uniÂverse are One—the same ‘stuff,’ manÂiÂfestÂing for a while in a cerÂtain ‘packÂage,’ and soon to return to formlessness.
It is a lot to wrap your head around, and in a sense, you canÂnot. One moment it makes no sense, and in the next, it does, at some deep, intuÂitive level. It is what I call the moment-by-moment path of wakÂing up.
Wayne C. Allen is a Zen-based psyÂchotherÂaÂpist and author. His latÂest book is This EndÂless Moment.
Related posts:
Tagged with: meaningless • no-self • Self-responsibility • self-responsible • simple-presence • This-Endless-Moment • victimhood. • waking-up • Wayne-C-Allen • Zen Approaches • Zen-Masters


![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.evernote.com%2Farticle-clipper.png)






![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.phoenixcentre.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fcleeng%2Fimg%2Flock2.png)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.phoenixcentre.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fcleeng%2Fimg%2Fpayment-methods-small.png)
It‘s quite in here! Why not leave a response?